Biography:Victoria Vesna is an artist, theorist, and
chair of the department of Design Media Arts at UCLA. Her work
has moved from performance and video installations to
experimental research that connects networked environments to
physical public spaces. Vesna has initiated and produced a
number of projects that address issues of identity, artificial
intelligence, telepresence and database aesthetics http://time.arts.ucla.edu/.
Her work has been featured in Art in America, Artweek,
Newsweek, Los Angeles Times and the San Francisco Chronicle,
as well as Der Spiegel (Germany), The Irish Times (Ireland),
Tema Celeste (Italy), and Veredas (Brazil). She has received
numerous grants from various educational and industrial
foundations.
Inna Razumova: How did your background in
performance and video installations influence your later work
in digital media?
Victoria Vesna: I was always
interested in exploring, experimenting and improvising.
Performance was the easiest and most immediate way out of the
established gallery world expectations and video installations
gave me room to experiment with the intersection of
performance and technology -- one cannot conceptualize an
installation without considering how the audience moves
through the piece, even if it has no interactive elements. My
early work was embedded in the alternative music scene, the
clubs and cable TV. The need to extend to an audience outside
of the established art scene was always present, so naturally
I was drawn to the net.
My love for performance was
rekindled recently when a group of us in the UC (UC Digital
Arts Network: UC DARNET) collaborated on a networked
performance piece with Karen Black. We were commissioned to do
a piece for a conference on collaborations at the Arizona
State University. For this event we hired actress Karen Black
and she was our "agent", participating in an academic
conference. Equipped with a lipstick camera and earpiece, she
was wirelessly connected to our group. This piece was exciting
for me because it rekindled my interest in exploring
performance. In my opinion, the net is performative in its
nature and I am really interested to play with the
possibilities.
I.R: The Web is an ephemeral, virtual
medium that is associated with the mobility, manipulability,
and transformation of data. Web is also one of this culture's
primary places for a fetishization of the body. (spy cams,
pornography, dating networks, avatar-based chat rooms, etc.).
In your opinion, why is a medium that functions mostly through
disembodiment so fascinated with the idea of body?
V.V: It is because our bodies do not only consist of
embodied, physical parts and our minds are not separate from
our bodies and we are not separate identities. I do not
consider this an opposition (idea of body / disembodiement),
but a return to learning that we have etheric bodies, and can
make telepathic connections to others on the other side of the
planet. It is very empowering to have a sense of connection to
someone who shares your ideas, whatever they may be, and feel
a physical sensation in relation to this. Of course we are all
in a very primitive stage and the first step is the
voyeuristic, sexual exploration. It is well recognized that
these parts of ourselves — the invisible and the sexual — are
the most repressed in our Western society. The Internet
provides a space for exploring our many identities, and
experimenting with ideas of extending our influence beyond our
local spaces.
I.R: Media has been viewed as
"prosthesis" or an extension of the body in the sense of
McLuhan. Considering the maturity of the Internet, how has
that relationship changed?
V.V: Prosthesis, is an
artificial device to replace a missing part of the body. I do
not believe that we are missing any parts of ourselves — it is
a matter of evolving and awakening all our potential. So, I
consider this to be our baby steps into the unknown potential
of ourselves, when we need help from technological devices.
Eventually, we will be able to teleport our bodies and
telepathically communicate to each other.
The Internet
is still in its early stages, not really mature. On a human
development scale I would place it at early puberty. It is
just beginning to take shape and move away from flat documents
that are hyperlinked. But, it did change dramatically in the
past 5 years, and although it is still a "prosthesis" of
sorts, it really is helping us visualize the invisible
exchange of data. Data exchange between people.
Some
perceive the net as a space for commerce, others as a space
for enlightenment. For me, the intersection of these
contradictions, the space in between, is the most interesting.
The idea of an extension eventually morphs into acceptance of
ourselves as a network that is part of a larger network. I
imagine the greatest shift will happen when the network
becomes embedded in everything through technology and via our
conscious acceptance of the overall connectivity. Extension
seems to bring an image of going outside of oneself.
I.R: What is the importance of the physical spaces
(site-specific installations) in your work? Specifically, your
recent project "Datamining Bodies" took place in a coalmine in
Dortmund, Germany. Could you tell us more about why you chose
this specific site, and what its importance is to the whole
project? Does it function as a metaphor, a context, a
historical parallel, or a physical body for the online part of
the "Datamining Bodies"?
V.V: Physical spaces are
really important to me. They are vehicles for the "virtual"
just as our bodies are for the "soul". I cannot start work on
an installation before I am in the space, feeling its specific
quality.
As far as the installation in the coal mine
goes, I did not choose this site. This was a group show for
which I was commissioned to do a piece that was connected to
the net. I first did some research about the site itself, the
started thinking of the mine and data metaphorically.
Zeche Zollern II/IV is a coal mine that ceased
operations in the late 1950s and that had been recently
converted into a museum dedicated to technology. In World War
II, it was one of the largest Nazi shelters. The exhibition
was a sort of a celebration of a move from the Industrial Age
to the Information Age and the artists were the signifiers of
this transition. I had a problem with this concept. There is
no clean shift from one age to another and I did not want to
participate in this idea. So I decided to challenge it by
connecting it to the uneasy idea of datamining bodies. The
organizer was not very pleased with the piece and consequently
made our work there pretty nightmarish (but that’s another
story).
"Datamining" is a term used in computer
science, traditionally defined as "information retrieval."
Many metaphors that refer to the physical act of mining, such
as "drilling" or "digging," are commonly used when discussing
the activity of accessing information.
What is
striking, if not disturbing, when researching the practice of
"datamining" information (whether it be medical, statistical
or business), is the "inhumanity," the disassociation from the
people who actually carry or contribute this information. I
was reading How We Became Posthuman by Kathryn Hayles at the
time and this influenced my thinking in relation to
datamining. With this in mind, my aim was to create a
site-specific piece that commented on the abstraction of
information by looking at the notion of mining data in
connection to the metaphorical representations of the human
body, and the false notion that there had been a clear-cut
shift from the Industrial to the Information Age. I felt that
the site of the now defunct coal mine was ideal for delivering
a message of warning about the dangerous aspects of mining
bodies of people for data. Or, worse, reducing people to
abstracted data.
I.R: In the "Datamining Bodies" new
data such as sound, digital video, and stills are being
ingested by the "body" in mine space through the rules of
tensegrity and datamining. Could you tell us a bit more about
how it happens? Specifically, why the deeper one mines, the
more layered the data and the less time there is to data mine?
Was there a reason for setting up the database that way?
V.V: The idea of data ingested by the "body" stays at
a conceptual level. To backtrack a bit, I was actively
researching visualization of networks, and learning about the
principles of tensegrity in relation to natural systems. I was
inspired to somehow utilize these principles for envisioning a
different type of body, an "energetic body," meaning a body
that is networked and built from information, but not
de-humanised. I got really interested in using tensegrity,
which is proven to work in physical spaces (Buckminster
Fuller, Kenneth Snelson) and appears in natural structures
(Donald Ingber, Scientific American "The Architecture of
Life"). I concluded this principle would work great in
information / network space. But, it is not a simple
programming task — it requires a certain philosophical outlook
and it took me awhile to find a creative programmer to work
with. Appropriately, I found a person who had similar ideas
and was already developing a software using these principles
on the web. Gerald de Jong, author of fluidiom, became my new
collaborator and the first piece we worked on was Datamining
Bodies. We moved on to developing "notime", so a lot of
Datamining Bodies remains in the conceptual realm.
I.R: Forgive my "data mining" you on the same project,
why did you limit your database to the mixture of images and
text from coal mines of the industrial era, psychoanalysis
texts, and medical images of the body? Could you comment on
the significance to these choices in "Datamining Bodies"?
V.V: The image of the coal mine is from the space
itself. Text about coal mines is from newspapers (usually
short blurbs about numbers of deaths with no elaboration). The
psychoanalytical text is by Larry Rickels whose research
focuses on Nazi Psychology. Larry is someone who explores this
subject in depth and I felt it is better to use his voice than
my surface knowledge of the subject. I consider the ultimate
datamining bodies as the human genome project. While
developing the piece, I walked over to the medical center here
at UCLA and got the data from the source. When I told them the
name of the piece, they said: "Oh, we do that every day here".
I.R: There are seven levels to the Datamining
Body. Is this a possible metaphor for Dante's seven circles of
hell?
V.V: Dante certainly came up, but it wasn’t
my primary source of inspiration. My interest in abstracting
the idea of body without dehumanizing it to "information" led
me to consider some of the Eastern representations of the
energy centers, specifically the Chakra system. "Chakras,"
which mean "wheels" in Sanskrit, are points of energy believed
to run along our spine. Ancient Hindus formulated that there
were seven of these energy wheels, each a different color and
spinning in a clockwise direction. Interestingly enough, the
spacing of chakras actually matches major nerve or endocrine
centres, while the colors correspond to the electromagnetic
spectrum. I decided to borrow the Chakra structure loosely,
using the colors of the electromagnetic field and shapes
constructed from tensegrity. The idea of descending was
magnified by the audio aspect which was created by David
Beaudry. As you descend through the layers, the sound moves up
(speakers were positioned from right above the viewer to right
by the feet). The sound layers, beginning with a clear space
(white/no text/no image) and ending with six layers of sound,
a lot of information and very little time. You would really
feel the pressure of sound above you and an uneasy lack of
control by the overwhelming data being thrown at you.
The entire move through the "body" is 333 minutes.
I.R: After interacting with the datamining body online
several times in a row, I noticed that the white sphere began
to change its shape dramatically, stretching and flickering
with increasing speed. It seemed so alive and disrupted that I
was afraid that I hurt or damaged it. Do the participants in
the gallery or online have a major influence on the structure
and fabric of tensile shapes?
V.V: Gerald de Jong
authored the piece in fluidiom which allows for programming
behaviors that change over time. He totally understood where I
was coming from and programmed / weaved the image that I
conceptualized into a fluidiom fabric. I believe that the
ideas of what we would have liked to happen, including what
you are alluding to, did not really materialize. We moved on
to collaborating on a new piece dealing with no time.
I.R: In your writings, you have mentioned that
you challenge the Western culture's dichotomy between body and
mind. In your view, what is the alternative? Synthesis,
poiesis, scientific materialism?
V.V: The alternative
is already there. When the Western ideas truly merge with
Eastern philosophies, we will have a much richer world.
I.R: Do you see any parallels between your datamining
bodies and Body Without Organs ("non-stratified, unformed,
intense matter") in the sense of Deleuze and Guattari? Does
tensegrity lead to stratification?
V.V: Actually, I
was really into the Body Without Organs while developing
Bodies Incorporated. Traces of that influence remain of course
-- all work is an evolution, and I can see that connection,
although I have to admit I was not making a conscious
reference, it was already absorbed. Does tensegrity lead to
stratification? I do not dare answer that question! That would
have to be a highly interdisciplinary discussion involving
many people — biologists, engineers, architects, artists,
theorists. And, I am sure many answers would emerge.
Tensegrity is an amazing system and there is much to be
learned from nature. How we use that knowledge remains to be
seen.
Inna Razumova is a current
graduate student at the Cadre laboratory for Digital Media
Arts.
|