2.1 Introduction

2.1.1 Practice must always be founded on sound theory. -Leonardo Da Vinci (Kleine, 1977, pp157-158)

2.1.2 In the first chapter I showed the emergence of an artist primarily focused on process, a media persona actively participating in a dialogue with the audience by creating interactive exhibitions/events, lecturing and teaching. Communication technologies have made this type of artist much more effective and dynamic. In this chapter I will situate the network artist in between the sciences and the humanities, actively contributing to creation of a new interdisciplinary creative culture.

2.1.3 Artists working with computer and other technologies that are a product of the scientific world are also informed and inspired by the exciting innovations and discoveries taking place in science. We are keenly interested in what the cultural critics and commentators from the humanities have to say on the meaning and impact these discoveries and innovations have on culture and society. Scientists can relate and understand our work easier primarily because we use the same tools-computers. Because our work and tools are in constant flux, we are forced to articulate the reasoning and meaning informing the art produced, which has traditionally been the role of art critics and historians. This creates room for an active dialogue with both humanists and scientists. Thus we are placed in between these "Two Cultures," which creates a triangle and promises to an emergence of a Third Culture. This is a privileged and dangerous position, at least in this transitional stage. Therefore it is important to take a look at the background and current status of these Two Cultures. [top]